Decoding CAP Theorem: The Core of Distributed Systems Made Simple
In today’s digital age, the backbone of many cloud applications is the distributed system. A distributed system is a network that stores and processes data across multiple nodes — whether they are physical servers or virtual machines. This architecture ensures better scalability, fault tolerance, and performance, making it an indispensable component of contemporary software design. However, with the power of distributed systems comes the complexity of managing data consistency, availability, and resilience against network partitions.
This is where the CAP theorem comes into play, guiding developers in making informed decisions about their data management strategies.
The CAP theorem, introduced by Eric Brewer in 2000, CAP stands for Consistency, Availability, and Partition Tolerance. The CAP theorem explains that in a distributed data system, you cannot have all three guarantees at the same time. You have to choose two out of the three.
Let’s first understand each term in detail :
Consistency
Consistency means that all users see the same data no matter which server they connect to. For this to happen, when data is updated on one server, it must be quickly updated on all other servers before confirming the update is successful.
Availability
Availability means that every request for data gets a response, even if some servers are down. In other words, all functioning servers in the system will always return some valid data, no matter what.
Partition Tolerance
Partition tolerance means the system continues to operate even if there are communication problems between servers. This means the system can handle network issues or delays and still keep working.
Let’s consider a real world scenario :
Consider a global online shopping platform like Amazon.
- Consistency: If you add an item to your cart, you expect that item to show up in your cart no matter which device or location you check it from.
- Availability: You want to be able to shop and check out at any time, even if some servers are down.
- Partition Tolerance: The platform should still function if some servers are temporarily unreachable due to network issues.
Scenario where one of the functionality always seems missing :
Let’s say there’s a network partition, splitting the servers into two groups that can’t communicate with each other:
- Consistency and Partition Tolerance (CP): The system might temporarily disable shopping in one of the partitions to ensure that all data remains consistent. This affects availability since some users can’t shop until the partition is resolved.
- Availability and Partition Tolerance (AP): The system might allow shopping to continue in both partitions, but some users might see outdated information because the system prioritizes availability over consistency.
- Consistency and Availability (CA): If there is no network partition, the system can provide both consistency and availability, but once a partition happens, it can’t provide both anymore.
In practice, distributed systems must make trade-offs based on their specific use cases and requirements. For example, a financial system might prioritize consistency over availability, while a social media platform might prioritize availability to ensure a continuous user experience.
That’s it!. Feel free to follow me and share your thoughts on what else I can improve.
See you in the next part! 😊
